Trump 2.0: ESG in the CrosshairsSince Trump returned to office in January 2025, the anti-ESG campaign has kicked into high gear. His administration has wasted no time targeting the financial architecture behind ESG. Climate-related disclosure rules are being rolled back. Federal agencies have been told to deprioritise environmental and social metrics. And top regulators are openly skeptical of ESG’s value.
Republican-led states are passing laws to punish banks and funds that factor ESG into investment decisions. They accuse Wall Street of “woke capitalism,” turning fiduciary duty into a political weapon. Major firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street are back in the spotlight, facing subpoenas, hearings, and the threat of losing state-managed assets.
Trump’s ESG rollback playbook includes:
- Repealing SEC climate disclosure mandates
- Blocking climate risk from influencing financial regulation
- Defunding DEI initiatives tied to ESG scoring
The goal is clear: paint ESG as ideological, not financial. And that’s having real consequences.
Proxy Season 2025: A Clash of IdeologiesThis year’s proxy season reflects the deepening divide. Shareholder meetings have become ideological battlegrounds. Progressive investors are pushing for stronger climate goals. Conservative activists are filing proposals to dismantle ESG strategies from within.
Groups like the National Center for Public Policy Research are leading anti-ESG efforts, demanding:
- Elimination of ESG committees
- Cost disclosures for ESG compliance
- Rollbacks of DEI policies
This tug-of-war is dragging companies into a political fight they didn’t sign up for—causing boardroom friction and reputational headaches.
Europe: Focused, but Feeling the PressureWhile the U.S. rethinks ESG, Europe’s regulatory machine keeps moving. The EU is pressing ahead with the CSRD, requiring over 50,000 companies—including many U.S. firms—to disclose ESG data.
There’s internal debate, especially among small and mid-sized businesses over compliance costs. But overall, Europe’s climate consensus is holding. Key measures include:
- The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which adds a carbon price to imports
- Stronger ESG disclosure rules via the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
- Taxonomy-driven incentives to steer capital into green sectors
That said, Europe isn’t immune to backlash. Inflation, geopolitical tensions, and rising populism are testing the limits of how far governments can push climate regulation. But unlike in the U.S., sustainability hasn’t been sucked into a culture war—yet.
What It Means for Business: Two Worlds, One StrategyFor global companies and investors, the growing ESG divide creates a high-stakes balancing act. The big challenges:
- Dual compliance: Different disclosure rules, reporting formats, and timelines on each side of the Atlantic
- Reputational risk: Too much ESG could get you sued in Texas. Too little might get you fined in Brussels
- Capital strategy friction: ESG investing is restricted in some U.S. states but required in parts of the EU
Bottom line: the idea of a single global ESG standard is fading. Companies now have to localize their approach and adapt to sharply different expectations.
The Role of Data and Tech: Getting It RightIn this fractured ESG world, accurate data and agile tools are non-negotiable. Platforms like HermesNet’s ESGData help companies stay ahead by automating compliance and centralising ESG metrics across global operations.
What businesses need now:
- Automated regulatory updates to keep pace with fast-moving rules
- Central dashboards to monitor ESG across regions
- Audit-ready reports for investors, regulators, and activists
Digital ESG tools don’t just make reporting easier—they protect companies from political whiplash and shifting regulatory winds.